Life, Bodily Integrity & Bio-enhancement
Right to life, informed consent, medical ethics, bio-security, human enhancement.
A living charter of principles, laws, customs, and cases — spanning tribes to star-faring societies, humans to artificial and bioengineered intelligences. Designed for scholarship today and adjudication tomorrow.
v1.0 · March 2026 · CC BY-SA 4.0
Norms indexed from primal bands to interstellar sapients
15 thematic domains of universal and cross-civilizational norms
Right to life, informed consent, medical ethics, bio-security, human enhancement.
Association, movement, conscience, pluralism, proportional limits.
Personal data, group privacy, explainability, consent, model updates.
Ownership, stewardship, commons, IP and data property rights.
Consent, coercion, smart contracts, unfair terms, remedies.
Agent rights and duties, shutdown rights, accountability, audits.
Illustrative entries with positive and negative examples
Any restriction on a fundamental right must be necessary, suitable, and minimally impairing of the protected interest.
Explainable AI audit logs enabled early detection of systemic bias in automated benefit allocation — harm prevented before deployment.
Indefinite suspension of public speech without judicial review led to systemic abuse and documented chilling effects on civil society.
The case entries above are illustrative examples that demonstrate the clause-card format. Historical case entries with verified sources are being added through the open contribution process.
Quick answers about the project, its status, and how to use it
CSC is an open, bilingual (English and Chinese) knowledge repository that documents and compares laws, ethics, and customs across human civilizations. It is organized into 11 meta-principles, 15 thematic domains, and contextual clauses from 8 civilizational traditions, and is designed for comparative law and ethics scholarship and for AI alignment and governance research.
No. Clause cards carry evidence levels, not binding authority. CSC is a scholarly reference and a structured dataset — not legislation, not a political manifesto, and not a substitute for professional legal advice.
Content is drafted with the assistance of large language models, then structured and curated by the maintainer. Every attestation cites a checkable source; systematic verification against original scholarship is ongoing, and each clause carries an explicit review status.
Yes. Text is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 and datasets under ODbL 1.0. Machine-readable clause cards (YAML/JSON) are available on GitHub, and the archived release has DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19343150.
Join as historian, legal scholar, ethicist, technologist, or citizen
Use the JSON Schema and PR template to add or refine a clause with sources and verified cases.
Attach positive/negative examples with verifiable scholarly sources and explicit evidence levels.
Participate in three-area review: law/ethics, history/culture, and technology/AI perspectives.